Post-COVID-19 patients in geriatric rehabilitation substantially recover in daily functioning and quality of life.

BACKGROUND: After an acute infection, older persons may benefit from geriatric rehabilitation (GR). OBJECTIVES: This study describes the recovery trajectories of post-COVID-19 patients undergoing GR and explores whether frailty is associated with recovery. DESIGN: Multicentre prospective cohort study. SETTING: 59 GR facilities in 10 European countries. PARTICIPANTS: Post-COVID-19 patients admitted to GR between October 2020 and October 2021. METHODS: Patients' characteristics, daily functioning (Barthel index; BI), quality of life (QoL; EQ-5D-5L) and frailty (Clinical Frailty Scale; CFS) were collected at admission, discharge, 6 weeks and 6 months after discharge. We used linear mixed models to examine the trajectories of daily functioning and QoL. RESULTS: 723 participants were included with a mean age of 75 (SD: 9.91) years. Most participants were pre-frail to frail (median [interquartile range] CFS 6.0 [5.0-7.0]) at admission. After admission, the BI first steeply increased from 11.31 with 2.51 (SE 0.15, P < 0.001) points per month and stabilised around 17.0 (quadratic slope: -0.26, SE 0.02, P < 0.001). Similarly, EQ-5D-5L first steeply increased from 0.569 with 0.126 points per month (SE 0.008, P < 0.001) and stabilised around 0.8 (quadratic slope: -0.014, SE 0.001, P < 0.001). Functional recovery rates were independent of frailty level at admission. QoL was lower at admission for frailer participants, but increased faster, stabilising at almost equal QoL values for frail, pre-frail and fit patients. CONCLUSIONS: Post-COVID-19 patients admitted to GR showed substantial recovery in daily functioning and QoL. Frailty at GR admission was not associated with recovery and should not be a reason to exclude patients from GR.

[Legally improved access to geriatric rehabilitation - prerequisites and weaknesses]. / Der gesetzlich verbesserte Zugang zur geriatrischen Rehabilitation ­ Voraussetzungen und Schwächen.

Geriatric rehabilitation is a cornerstone of the German healthcare system to maintain the functional capacity of older patients and prevent the need for long-term care. Until recently, access to geriatric rehabilitation was largely limited to post-acute care. With the introduction of new legislation, patients aged 70 and over can be referred to geriatric rehabilitation by practitioners. However, in order to prescribe geriatric rehabilitation, physicians must document relevant diagnoses supported by the results of a series of functional or cognitive assessments. Alongside this information, the SINGER profile has been introduced. It is mandatory, although there is currently no manual to guide assessment with this tool. Diagnoses and test results must be consistent in documenting the need for geriatric rehabilitation. However, individual assessment of resources and motivation are prerequisites that need to be assessed by prescribing practitioners prior to prescription, considering the structure of the available formats. First analyses document improvement in access to geriatric rehabilitation but point to limited availability.

[Geriatrics and geriatric aspects in the German coalition agreement of 2021]. / Geriatrie und geriatrische Aspekte im Koalitionsvertrag 2021.

BACKGROUND: The proportion of older people in Germany is increasing. By the next federal election in 2025 the Federal Statistical Office of Germany expects that one third of the population will have reached retirement age. Older people are thus one of the largest voter groups and are particularly politically relevant. OBJECTIVE: How does the federal government support the living conditions of this voter group? What are the plans of the federal government regarding medical care of older people? METHODS: A content analysis of the coalition agreement was carried out with respect to aspects of demographic change, geriatric care and living conditions of older people. The coded text passages were categorized using a mixed inductive-deductive approach. Finally, the implementation progress of concrete projects after 1.5 years in office was evaluated. RESULTS: This study identified and categorized 23 passages with just under 620 words (about 1% of the total text) in the coalition agreement. Of the passages nine were assigned to the topic older population, six passages to medical care and eight to nursing care. Of the 23 passages 14 contained concrete plans for action or target dates. In the first 1.5 years of the federal government, partial progress could be identified in 4 of these, while no projects were realized. CONCLUSION: Overall, the coalition agreement shows an awareness for an ageing population. In view of the demographic development, however, few solutions are proposed for genuine geriatric aspects. The first year in office was strongly influenced by other topics, which resulted in unplanned laws and regulations and projects from the coalition agreement faded into the background.

eHealth in Geriatric Rehabilitation: An International Survey of the Experiences and Needs of Healthcare Professionals.

While eHealth can help improve outcomes for older patients receiving geriatric rehabilitation, the implementation and integration of eHealth is often complex and time-consuming. To use eHealth effectively in geriatric rehabilitation, it is essential to understand the experiences and needs of healthcare professionals. In this international multicentre cross-sectional study, we used a web-based survey to explore the use, benefits, feasibility and usability of eHealth in geriatric rehabilitation settings, together with the needs of working healthcare professionals. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize quantitative findings. The survey was completed by 513 healthcare professionals from 16 countries. Over half had experience with eHealth, although very few (52 of 263 = 20%) integrated eHealth into daily practice. Important barriers to the use or implementation of eHealth included insufficient resources, lack of an organization-wide implementation strategy and lack of knowledge. Professionals felt that eHealth is more complex for patients than for themselves, and also expressed a need for reliable information concerning available eHealth interventions and their applications. While eHealth has clear benefits, important barriers hinder successful implementation and integration into healthcare. Tailored implementation strategies and reliable information on effective eHealth applications are needed to overcome these barriers.

Validation of a telephone-based administration of the simplified nutritional appetite questionnaire.

BACKGROUND: Anorexia of aging is characterized by an age-associated reduction of appetite, whose aetiology in most cases is multifactorial and which often triggers malnutrition. The Simplified Nutritional Appetite Questionnaire (SNAQ) is an established screening tool. This study aimed to investigate reliability, validity, and feasibility of its telephone administration (T-SNAQ) in German community-dwelling older adults. METHODS: This cross-sectional single-centre study recruited participants from April 2021 to September 2021. First, the SNAQ was translated into German according to an established methodology. After translation, reliability, construct validity, and feasibility of the T-SNAQ were analysed. A convenience sample of community-dwelling older adults aged ≥70 years was recruited. The following measurements were applied to all participants: T-SNAQ, Mini Nutritional Assessment - Short Form (MNA-SF), six-item Katz index of independence in activities of daily living (ADL), eight-item Lawton instrumental activities of daily living (IADL), telephone Montreal Cognitive Assessment (T-MoCA); FRAIL scale, Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-15) and Charlson co-morbidity index as well as daily caloric and protein intake. RESULTS: One hundred twenty participants (59.2% female) with a mean age of 78.0 ± 5.8 years were included in the present study. The percentage of participants identified with poor appetite based on T-SNAQ was 20.8% (n = 25). T-SNAQ showed a good internal reliability with a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.64 and a good test-retest reliability [intraclass coefficient of 0.95 (P < 0.05)]. Regarding construct validity, T-SNAQ was significantly positively correlated with MNA-SF (r = 0.213), T-MoCA (r = 0.225), daily energy (r = 0.222) and protein intake (r = 0.252) (P < 0.05). It also demonstrated a significant negative association with GDS-15 (r = -0.361), FRAIL scale (r = -0.203) and Charlson co-morbidity index (r = -0.272). Regarding applicability, the mean time for T-SNAQ was 95 s and completion rate was 100%. CONCLUSIONS: The T-SNAQ is a feasible screening instrument for anorexia of aging in community-dwelling older adults via telephone interviews.

Nutritional Care Practices in Geriatric Rehabilitation Facilities across Europe: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Many patients in geriatric rehabilitation (GR) are physically frail at the time of admission and suffer from malnutrition and sarcopenia, which may worsen rehabilitation outcomes. This study aims to obtain insight into the current nutritional care practices in GR facilities across Europe. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, a questionnaire focused on nutritional care practices in GR was distributed across experts in EUGMS member countries. Data were analyzed by using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: In total, 109 respondents working in 25 European countries participated, and the results showed that not all GR patients were screened and treated for malnutrition, and not all participants used (inter)national guidelines when performing nutritional care. The results also showed variations across European geographical areas related to screening and treatment of malnutrition, sarcopenia, and frailty. Even though the participants underlined the importance of dedicating time to nutritional care, they experienced barriers in its implementation, which were mostly due to a lack of resources. CONCLUSION: As malnutrition, sarcopenia, and frailty are often present in patients admitted to GR, in addition to being interrelated, it is recommended to develop an integrated approach to screening and treatment of all three clinical problems.

How to Conduct International Geriatric Rehabilitation Research?

With an ageing global population and an increasing focus on aging in place, the number of people in need of geriatric rehabilitation (GR) is rapidly increasing. As current GR practice is very heterogenous, cross-country comparisons could allow us to learn from each other and optimise the effectiveness of GR. However, international GR research comes with many challenges. This article summarises the facilitators and barriers relating to the recruitment of rehabilitation centres, the inclusion of patients, and data collection, as experienced by experts in the field of international GR research. The three most important methodological recommendations for conducting cross-national collaborative research in the field of GR are (1) make use of existing (inter)national networks and social media to aid recruitment of GR centres; (2) clearly define the GR treatment, setting, and patient characteristics in the inclusion criteria; and (3) use a hierarchical study structure to communicate transparently and regularly with both national and local coordinators. International GR research would greatly benefit from the implementation of a core dataset in regular GR care. Therefore, future studies should focus on developing an international consensus regarding the outcomes and corresponding cross-culturally validated measurement instruments to be used during GR.

Malnutrition and Sarcopenia in COVID-19 Survivors.

Malnutrition has been one of the most common complications of older COVID-19 survivors. COVID-19 associated symptoms like loss of appetite as well as changes in taste and smell may trigger the deterioration of nutritional status, while other complications of the disease may contribute to it, like respiratory failure that necessitates admission to the ICU. Especially in nursing home residents reduced food intake may be related to preexisting and also to incident geriatric syndromes like delirium. Sarcopenia has also been highly prevalent in older COVID-19 survivors. It is caused and exacerbated by COVID-19-associated inflammatory processes, total or partial immobilization, and malnutrition. COVID-19 survivors may be at high risk of developing the vicious circle that results from the interaction of deteriorating nutritional status and declining functionality. Regular monitoring of nutritional and functional status is, therefore, indicated in all older COVID-19 survivors. If malnutrition and/or functional decline have been identified in this patient population, low-threshold provision of individualized nutritional and exercise interventions should be installed. In those that are most seriously affected by malnutrition and sarcopenia ambulatory or inpatient rehabilitation has to be considered. Geriatric rehabilitation programs should be specifically adapted to the needs of older patients with COVID-19.

[Sarcopenia-what should the orthopedist know?] / Sarkopenie ­ was sollte der Orthopäde wissen?

Sarcopenia - the age-associated loss of muscle function and muscle mass - is of utmost importance for older patients with degenerative and traumatic diseases of the musculoskeletal system, as it closely linked to the loss of independence and quality of life in higher age. Impairments of mobility that are highly present in this patient group accelerate the age-associated decline of muscle function and muscle mass. The diagnosis of sarcopenia relies primarily on tests of strength and function like handgrip, chair-rise test and gait speed. The measurement of muscle mass is desirable, but not mandatory. In the near future the prevention and treatment of sarcopenia has to become part of the clinical routine for older orthopedic patients. Specific modifications of physical exercise like resistance training and optimal nutrition with regard to protein intake (1.0-1.2 g/kg bodyweight per day) in combination with vitamin D supplementation are key components of sarcopenia prevention and therapy.

Evaluation of a new screening instrument for psychological distress in postacute rehabilitation in older person.

PURPOSE: Although psychological distress has a negative impact on functional recovery, institutionalisation and mortality rates, there is typically no established procedure to screen for psychological distress in geriatric rehabilitation. The aim of the study was to evaluate a brief single-item Verbal Numerical Rating Scale (VNRS-PD) as a screening tool for psychological distress in multimorbid geriatric rehabilitation patients. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, N = 132 geriatric rehabilitation in-patients (M = 82 years old; 70.5% female) completed a verbal numerical rating scale (VNRS-PD) on satisfaction with their mood as well as the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and the short-form of the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS). Based on the questionnaire data, the rehabilitation patients were classified as high or low in psychopathology. Using receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, optimal cutoff scores of the VNRS-PD were calculated for each questionnaire to detect significant psychological distress. RESULTS: Between 28.8% (HADS ≥ 18) and 43.9% (GDS ≥ 6) of the sample had above-cutoff questionnaire scores. The area under the curve (AUC) of the VNRS-PD varied from 0.785 (95%-CI 0.709-0.861) (GDS ≥ 6) and 0.790 (95%-CI 0.716-0.864) (HADS ≥ 18) to 0.807 (95%-CI 0.734-0.880) (GDS ≥ 7). A score of ≤ 5 in the VNRS-PD proved to be the cutoff with an optimal trade-off between sensitivity (0.776-0.867) and specificity (0.638-0.703). CONCLUSION: The VNRS-PD may be a suitable screening instrument to detect patients with psychological distress in inpatient geriatric rehabilitation for and to initiate further diagnostics within a graduated psychodiagnostic scheme. This first step may help to identify older patients with psychological distress and mental disorders, to initiate targeted interventions. Further research is needed to replicate these findings in a larger sample.

Management of post-acute COVID-19 patients in geriatric rehabilitation: EuGMS guidance.

PURPOSE: To describe a guidance on the management of post-acute COVID 19 patients in geriatric rehabilitation. METHODS: The guidance is based on guidelines for post-acute COVID-19 geriatric rehabilitation developed in the Netherlands, updated with recent insights from literature, related guidance from other countries and disciplines, and combined with experiences from experts in countries participating in the Geriatric Rehabilitation Special Interest Group of the European Geriatric Medicine Society. RESULTS: This guidance for post-acute COVID-19 rehabilitation is divided into a section addressing general recommendations for geriatric rehabilitation and a section addressing specific processes and procedures. The Sect. "General recommendations for geriatric rehabilitation" addresses: (1) general requirements for post-acute COVID-19 rehabilitation and (2) critical aspects for quality assurance during COVID-19 pandemic. The Sect. "Specific processes and procedures", addresses the following topics: (1) patient selection; (2) admission; (3) treatment; (4) discharge; and (5) follow-up and monitoring. CONCLUSION: Providing tailored geriatric rehabilitation treatment to post-acute COVID-19 patients is a challenge for which the guidance is designed to provide support. There is a strong need for additional evidence on COVID-19 geriatric rehabilitation including developing an understanding of risk profiles of older patients living with frailty to develop individualised treatment regimes. The present guidance will be regularly updated based on additional evidence from practice and research.

Investigation of superspreading COVID-19 outbreak events in meat and poultry processing plants in Germany: A cross-sectional study.

Since May 2020, several COVID-19 outbreaks have occurred in the German meat industry despite various protective measures, and temperature and ventilation conditions were considered as possible high-risk factors. This cross-sectional study examined meat and poultry plants to assess possible risk factors. Companies completed a self-administered questionnaire on the work environment and protective measures taken to prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection. Multivariable logistic regression analysis adjusted for the possibility to distance at least 1.5 meters, break rules, and employment status was performed to identify risk factors associated with COVID-19 cases. Twenty-two meat and poultry plants with 19,072 employees participated. The prevalence of COVID-19 in the seven plants with more than 10 cases was 12.1% and was highest in the deboning and meat cutting area with 16.1%. A subsample analysis where information on maximal ventilation rate per employee was available revealed an association with the ventilation rate (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 0.996, 95% CI 0.993-0.999). When including temperature as an interaction term in the working area, the association with the ventilation rate did not change. When room temperatures increased, the chance of testing positive for COVID-19 (AOR 0.90 95% CI 0.82-0.99) decreased, and the chance for testing positive for COVID-19for the interaction term (AOR 1.001, 95% CI 1.000-1.003) increased. Employees who work where a minimum distance of less than 1.5 m between workers was the norm had a higher chance of testing positive (AOR 3.61; 95% CI 2.83-4.6). Our results further indicate that climate conditions and low outdoor air flow are factors that can promote the spread of SARS-CoV-2 aerosols. A possible requirement for pandemic mitigation strategies in industrial workplace settings is to increase the ventilation rate.

The COVID rehabilitation paradox: why we need to protect and develop geriatric rehabilitation services in the face of the pandemic.

Older multi-morbid persons often fall seriously ill due to COVID-19. To be able to participate in a social life again, they often need special rehabilitation measures. Geriatric rehabilitation is a multi-professional service geared to these needs. Paradoxically, however, capacities in geriatric rehabilitation are currently being reduced despite increasing demand. The reasons are manifold and are not only due to the current situation. This article highlights the current situation leading to the COVID rehabilitation paradox and shows ways to learn from it for the future.

Treatment of sarcopenia in nursing home residents: a scoping review protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Sarcopenia has been recognised as a disease that is consistently associated with a range of geriatric syndromes and negative health consequences. The prevalence of sarcopenia is high among nursing home residents. Several systematic reviews have assessed the efficacy of a range of treatment strategies against sarcopenia. However, no systematic review discussing specifically the treatment options for sarcopenic nursing home residents has been conducted so far. The objective of this scoping review, therefore, is to identify and map existing studies that assessed the feasibility and effectiveness of interventions that were conducted with the aim to treat sarcopenic nursing home residents. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The protocol was developed using an established scoping review methodological framework. A systematic search of relevant literature databases will be conducted. We will also conduct a search of ClinicalTrials.gov and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform Search Portal for ongoing and recently completed trials, and will search for grey literature. Two reviewers will independently screen titles and abstracts for inclusion, followed by screening of the full text of potentially relevant articles to determine final inclusion. A data extraction sheet will be developed including key study characteristics that will be relevant for collating, summarising and reporting the results of the scoping review. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The proposed scoping review will undertake a secondary analysis of publicly available data, and therefore does not require ethical approval. The results will be disseminated to researchers in the field by submitting the review to a peer-reviewed international journal and by presenting our findings at relevant conferences. We expect that the results of the final review will help to guide future research in the field of sarcopenia treatment for nursing home residents.

[Post-acute geriatric rehabilitation outcomes in fracture patients treated in an orthogeriatric trauma center-A prospective investigation with historical control]. / Outcome von Patienten in der geriatrischen Rehabilitation mit und ohne alterstraumatologische Akutbehandlung.

BACKGROUND: Despite the increasing amount of positive evidence with respect to mortality for the orthogeriatric co-management in a center for geriatric traumatology (CGT), effects on the course after the acute inpatient hospital treatment have been insufficiently investigated. METHODS: Patients over 75 years old who needed rehabilitation following acute inpatient treatment before (retrospective, n = 90) and after (prospective, n = 99) the introduction of a certified CGT were investigated. The two groups were compared with respect to the frequency of discharge into an indication-specific (AHB) and geriatric rehabilitation, mobility performance including the five times sit-to-stand test, short physical performance battery (SPPB) and competence in activities of daily living with the Barthel index (BI). RESULTS: After introduction of a CGT 17.2% (95 % confidence interval [95 % CI]: 10-25%; p < 0.027) of the patients were discharged to a specialized orthopedic inpatient rehabilitation (AHB) vs. 6.7% (95 % CI: 1-12%) before the introduction. Correspondingly less patients needed geriatric rehabilitation (before CGT 93.3 %, 95 % CI: 88.1-98.6 vs. CGT 82.8 %, 95 % CI: 75-90; p < 0.001). The overall outcome of post-acute geriatric inpatient rehabilitation improved in both groups but did not differ. Patients who needed two therapy sessions in the CGT were clearly poorer than those with one therapy session with respect to activities of daily living (BI: 34.1, 95 % CI: 30-37.2 vs. 41.2, 95 % CI: 30.9-51.4) and mobility performance (SPPB: 1.2, 95 % CI: 0.7-1.8 vs. 2.2, 95 % CI: 0.9-3.4; p = 0.048). The differences remained despite improvement of both groups during geriatric rehabilitation. CONCLUSION: The establishment of a CGT enables more patients to be discharged into a less cost-intensive AHB. The more intensive treatment in the CGT offers more severely affected patients the chance for further functional improvement through post-acute inpatient geriatric rehabilitation. A predominantly closing treatment of patients in a CGT is not conceivable in the CGT model presented.

EuGMS survey on structures of geriatric rehabilitation across Europe.

PURPOSE: Geriatric rehabilitation provides effective multidisciplinary treatment for older people who show symptoms of relevant and potentially reversible functional decline. The aim of this study is to provide an overview on structures of geriatric rehabilitation across Europe. METHODS: All European Geriatric Medicine Society (EuGMS) Full board members, each representing one member state of the society, were asked to complete an online questionnaire about the current structure of geriatric rehabilitation in their country. RESULTS: Thirty-one out of 33 EuGMS Full Board members participated in this questionnaire. Geriatric rehabilitation was officially recognized in 65% (20/31) of participating countries while 29% (9/31) had no geriatric rehabilitation services in their country. In countries with geriatric rehabilitation, the number of available beds varied widely (0-70/100,000 inhabitants). Average length of stay varied from 7 to 65 days. The estimated mean age of the patients in geriatric rehabilitation was 80 years, with most patients being older than 70 years. Six countries had no specified lower age limit and no country had an upper age limit. 42% (13/31) of countries reported having national or local guidelines and 35% (11/31) had a benchmarking or audit system established. Most participants responded positively about the prospects for improvement in the field. CONCLUSION: We observed major differences among EuGMS member countries with regard to the availability of geriatric rehabilitation and how it was organized. Despite various barriers in most countries, future improvement in geriatric rehabilitation services is anticipated.

European consensus on core principles and future priorities for geriatric rehabilitation: consensus statement.

PURPOSE: In response to the growing recognition of geriatric rehabilitation and to support healthcare providers which need strategies to support older people with frailty who have experienced functional decline, we developed a consensus statement about core principles and future priorities for geriatric rehabilitation. METHODS: We used a three-stage approach to establish consensus-preparation, consensus and review. RESULTS: The consensus statement is grouped under 11 headings from (1) "Definition of GR" to (11) "Effective strategies to develop GR in Europe", which define geriatric rehabilitation in a way that is compatible with existing service models across Europe. Additionally future goals around research and education are highlighted. CONCLUSION: The definitions of the consensus statement can provide a starting point for those wishing to further develop geriatric rehabilitation in their jurisdiction and help to develop strategic alliances with other specialties, serving as a basis for a pan-European approach to geriatric rehabilitation.

[Outcomes of multimorbid vascular surgery patients with and without major amputation in a German geriatric rehabilitation clinic]. / Ergebnisvergleich von multimorbiden gefäßchirurgischen Patienten mit und ohne Majoramputation in einer deutschen stationären geriatrischen Rehabilitationsklinik.

BACKGROUND: In the course of demographic developments, an increase of vascular surgical procedures including major amputations in very elderly, multimorbid geriatric patients is expected. Due to the high vulnerability of these patients, geriatric rehabilitation directly following the acute inpatient treatment is likely to improve the abilities of these patients. This issue is not well analyzed in Germany up to now. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study includes all patients who were admitted to our clinic for geriatric rehabilitation after vascular surgery between 01 June 2012 and 31 December 2013. Geriatric assessments at the time of admission and discharge were considered. The group was divided into rehabilitation patients with major limb amputation and nonmajor limb amputation. Both groups were analyzed with respect to functional parameters and activities in daily life (ADL) during the course of rehabilitation as well as the discharge location (home versus nursing home). RESULTS: A total of 30 major-limb-amputee and 77 nonmajor-limb-amputee rehabilitants could be analyzed. Before surgical intervention, 100 % of patients lived in a home care situation. The median age was 78.3 years. During rehabilitation, both groups showed highly significant improvements in ADL (Barthel index), Timed Up and Go test, walking distance, and stair climbing; however the nonmajor amputees surpassed the major amputees in most mobility assessments especially in the five chair-rising test. The rehabilitation time (median) was 41.8 days for major and 23.9 days for nonmajor amputees. More than 90 % of the rehabilitants in both groups could be discharged home. CONCLUSION: The data from this retrospective study indicate that even advanced old age, multimorbid patients benefit from geriatric rehabilitation after vascular surgery intervention. Although less distinct than the group of minor amputee rehabilitants, highly significant improvements were also demonstrated in the group of major amputee rehabilitants as assessed in the discharge mobility and ADL results compared to the admission assessment results. These improvements were achieved in an adequate time period and led to discharge into home care for the majority of patients.